news
Sunshine Coast Residents Fight Unauthorized Use of Homes in Online Listings
Community members across the Sunshine Coast are speaking out after discovering their properties and neighbourhoods reproduced without consent in online listings, real estate databases and promotional materials.
How we reported this

Duplicate and misappropriated images are turning up in short-term rental listings, real estate portals and tourism promotions, and residents from Mooloolaba to Peregian Beach say they are only finding out when strangers turn up at their front gates or inbox them asking about a property that was never for rent.
The issue has sharpened in 2026 as the Sunshine Coast's short-term rental sector has expanded rapidly alongside the region's coastal population growth, creating conditions where photographs of private homes, streetscapes and backyards circulate across multiple platforms, sometimes attached to listings the homeowner knows nothing about. With Sunshine Coast Council still developing its short-term rental registration framework, expected to move toward a formal scheme before the end of the 2026 calendar year, the regulatory gap is real and residents are feeling it.
From Buderim backyards to Hastings Street holiday lets
In the Buderim area, several households in the streets surrounding Buderim Mountain State Forest have reported finding photographs of their yards and driveways reproduced on accommodation booking platforms under different addresses. The images, they say, appear to have been scraped from older real estate listings that pre-date their purchase of the properties. One Hastings Street, Noosa Heads precinct business owner raised the same concern specifically about commercial photography taken for a 2023 refurbishment, which subsequently appeared on at least two unrelated platforms promoting different venues entirely.
The Sunshine Coast's property market context amplifies the frustration. Median house prices on the coast have climbed substantially since 2020, and the Council's planning records show Maroochydore's new CBD precinct alone has generated hundreds of new residential approvals in the past three years. More dwellings, photographed more often for more purposes, means more raw material for the problem. Residents group Sunshine Coast Community Alliance, which is active across the Caloundra to Noosa corridor, has been fielding member questions about what avenues exist, whether through the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, or direct complaints to platform operators.
The OAIC's published guidance, available on its website, notes that photographs of identifiable private spaces can in certain contexts constitute personal information under the Privacy Act 1988, particularly where those images are used in a way that is reasonably likely to identify an individual's home address or daily patterns. That guidance does not create an automatic takedown right, but it gives residents a framework for formal complaints.
What the platforms say, and what residents can actually do
The major booking platforms, including Airbnb and Booking.com, each publish intellectual property and image misuse reporting mechanisms, though users who have tested those systems describe the process as slow. Residents' advocates recommend documenting every instance with a screenshot including the URL, date and time before filing any complaint, because listings are frequently amended or deleted once a dispute is raised.
Sunshine Coast Council's local laws team can be contacted directly if a misleading listing appears to breach local advertising provisions, and the Council's Planning and Development directorate has previously worked with strata bodies and neighbourhood associations to address misrepresentation in short-term rental contexts. The Maroochydore-based Sunshine Coast branch of the Real Estate Institute of Queensland also maintains a complaints pathway for listings involving member agents, though private peer-to-peer platforms sit outside that jurisdiction.
Residents who suspect an image of their property is in circulation are advised to run a reverse image search through Google Images or TinEye, both free tools, before contacting the OAIC at its Canberra office or lodging a report online. If the image appears in a listing that also includes a false address, the matter may additionally involve Queensland Fair Trading, which handles misleading advertising complaints under state consumer law. A formal complaint lodged before August 31, 2026, would still fall within the standard 12-month rolling investigation window those agencies typically apply.
The broader picture is one the region will keep confronting. A coast that markets itself on lifestyle imagery, beach houses, hinterland views, canal frontages, generates an economy of photographs that outlive their original purpose. Getting ahead of that now, before the Council's rental registration scheme lands, is something residents say they should not have to manage alone.